Tuesday, November 13, 2018

On Dangerous Ground: In a Lonely Place (Ray, 1950), The Killers (Siodmak, 1946)



















In a Lonely Place (Nicholas Ray, 1950)

A shattered world, future so bleak 
it’s hardly worth the effort. If not for 
a post-war temper, lashing out, hairpin-
turns at ninety psychopaths an hour, 
losing a woman so beautiful she could 
pawn your breath, and schlep the ticket
from L.A. to Tijuana and back again. 
But asking that hat-check girl home to 
turn a hack screenplay into something 
saleable? So fucking cynical, yet so 
human. As if those cloying lines- “I was 
born when you kissed me. I died when 
you left me...", blah, blah, blah- were 
nothing more than an excuse. In the end, 
you couldn't even look at each other, 
so profound the betrayal. Though, in 
this version, you weren't guilty, or at 
least I don't think you were. But the 
other crimes. Much closer to the edge, 
everything played out, depicting this 
world we have so clearly inherited.  




















The Killers (Robert Siodmak, 1946)

Night time the proverbial 
for irritable hoodlums, 
terrorising night-shift small-
town diners. Laconically 
seeking jack-of-all boxer, 
small-time criminal, gas
station pump-man. Twenty
minutes and Hemingway is
conveniently thrashed. With
a thin line separating history
from back-story. Think Citizen 
Kane for pulp-heads, albeit  
with a jones for fractured 
narratives. A frozen demeanour, 
ever the plight of insurance 
investigators, Swede's passivity 
and hat-factory heist despair. 
O'Brien, untarnished enough 
to ask lascivious Ava if she
would take to his hotel room
stands at attention, like he's
recovering from severe case 
of erectile dysfunction. Not 
condition that Swede recognises.  
“She’s beautiful,” he says, 
droolinglike Bugs Bunny on 
steroids, down Ava's cleavage
leaving his girl-friend on the 
sidelines searching for a different 
angle, while only the musicians  
stand capable of calculating so
slippery a hypotenuse. But whose 
dream is this? Movies-within-
movies, planetary jail-house spiel, 
death bed supplication, a stair-
case littered with Ava’s victims. 
All to prevent premiums rising 
a tenth of percent. And what 
about the pay-out? Times Square 
humanity, five-and-ten jewellery, 
more than anyone can imagine.


http://www.facebook.com/facebook-widgets/share.php

Thursday, November 01, 2018

False Equivalencies: Parsing Perloff's Forward to the 50th Anniversary Edition of Ed Dorn's Ed Dorn's Gunslinger

Hard to believe it's been fifty years since the publication of Ed Dorn's Gunslinger. To commemorate the occasion, Duke University has brought out a 50th anniversary edition. Though a lot of water has passed under the bridge in the intervening years, re-reading Dorn's fin d'epoch epic of the west  is, as ever, a pleasure. While time has blunted some of its impact, Gunslinger seems as alive, as radical and as funny as ever. This latest, and highly attractive, edition comes accompanied by a handful of related texts, including Olson's Bibliography of America for Ed Dorn, Michael Davidson's The Elimination of the Draw and Marjorie Perloff's introduction to Duke's earlier edition, as well as a new forward by Perloff. For me, Dorn's poem hardly needs an introduction or surrounding texts, but perhaps Duke thought it provident to pad the book so to give  punters a reason to buy a poem that had only a few years back  appeared in Dorn's Collected Poems. Nor can I quite see the value of including Olson's important Bibliography For E.D., other than to establish the origins of Dorn's polymath credentials. On the other hand, such texts will no doubt be useful to those new to the poem and poet.

But it's Perloff's forward that I find problematical. Not so much that it's  awkward and truncated compared to her more elegant earlier intro, originally published in 1981. It's more what she's saying, or, often, not saying. My hackles were immediately on alert when she quoted her earlier introduction, that Dorn's portrayal of Howard Hughes in the poem "anticipates...the current 'legend' of Donald Trump and his empire." Thin ice, indeed. Though she admits her statement from all those years ago had nothing to do a sense of prescience, given that she knew very little about Trump at the time. As she acknowledges, back then Trump was  simply a silver-spooned property developer, hotel and soon to be casino owner. Perloff then tries to bring it all up to date, only to throw  oil on this would-be fire,  writing, "From Hughes to Trump: it seems a clear-cut example of Marx's aphorism that great men always appear twice, the first time as tragedy, the second as farce." No matter that she's putting a slight spin on Marx's aphorism, which referred to history, not to great men. But the comparison is too easy. Saying that Trump is a farce, only to leave it at that, minimizes the danger he and his presidency represent. A farce, perhaps, but a tragedy for those who are bearing the brunt of his policies. And what about her statement that Hughes in Gunslinger begins as a figure of mystery and charisma and ends up a "Trumpian comic-book character, a mere cypher."  While Hughes is certainly a comic-book figure in Gunslinger, the same can't be said for Trump,  as he twiddles his fingers over the nuclear button. Saying he's a "mere cypher" is  to belittle his responsibility in cultivating his repulsive brand of nativism. And, unlike Hughes in Gunslinger, Trump is not about to simply vanish from the scene.


The comparison, in any case, is, at best, superficial. At least Hughes refrained from doing the country a disservice by running for office. Moreover, Hughes actually produced things. Something Trump can never be accused of doing.  Sure, Hughes was a right-wing narcissist, obsessed with Hollywood starlets. But he was hardly  a danger to the world. Neither did he inculcate or exploit a social movement. Hughes's allure, as exemplified by his presence in Dorn's poem, derived from being a mega-wealthy one-off, someone with buying power, but without much concern for demographics, other than who flew his planes, bought his parts and watched his films. Trump might have begun  as a "mere cypher" (think Gunslinger's "Talking Barrel"), but he quickly mutated into a brand. As president his presence is that of a fifth-rate stand-up comic, devoid of irony and humour. Unlike Hughes, he has his army of followers, many of whom are armed and dangerous, and he  delights in feeding them red meat. At the same time he offers the Mercers, the Kochs, Murdoch and Adelson something to exploit. Perloff calls Trump's rise a case of "marvelous accidentalism," but Trump was no accident; he'd had been planning his assault on the presidency ever since the 1980s. It was then just a matter of being in the right place at the right time, and a willingness to be the embodiment of a set of historical circumstances stretching back as far as one wishes to take it. Traces of those circumstances can be found in Dorn's work, from Geography and North Atlantic Turbine, to Gunslinger and beyond, in which he logs the contradictions and impact of corporate politics, supply-side economics and trickle-down neo-liberalism.


If, as Perloff contends, Gunslinger anticipated the bizarre pronouncements and rhetorical games of the Trump campaign, she's definitely over-estimating Trump's linguistic and mental capabilities. Because Trump's fractured rhetoric and over-heated pronouncements, however bizarre, are tailored-made for his base. Unlike anything in Gunslinger, his  language is not only sickeningly prosaic but devoid of so much as a shred of irony or perspective. It's simply  pressing emotional buttons. Lacking any semblance of  linguistic virtuosity, he's as far from Gunslinger's linguistic tropes and games as one can possibly imagine, his non-linearity constituting a mental incapacity that only extends to the nearest slogan or soundbite, the more vile and violent the better.

But Perloff has her moments, citing  Amiri Baraka regarding Dorn's origins and class to the effect that Dorn  "reflected that tribal sense of being somehow distanced from an America he was obviously so deeply part of." "Michael Moore-land," Perloff calls it, and, yes, Dorn did share a similar background and was all too aware of  the effect such demographic marginality brings. But Baraka would have been attuned to the function and drift of Dorn's poetics enough to point out the difference between Dorn's ability to read the fluctuation of historical circumstances and Moore's all-too-easy reductionism, no matter how laudable the latter's politics might be. Nor can one argue with Perloff's claim that Trump's playbook and stunts come straight out of the Barnum and Bailey (Barnum and Bigly). After all,  he's exactly the sort of huckster Americans have long been fascinated with. But this is hardly a reason to conclude that Gunslinger  can be said to "look ahead" to the Trump era, rather than simply stating  what was, and is, embedded in the culture.

In the end, Dorn would have dissected Trump in the same way he had everyone up to Bush II, critiquing  his abuse of power, dodgy logic and language. But Trump might well have been too easy a target. Never one to toe the standard line, Dorn might have opted to double down on his own brand of contrarian politics and set his sights on those who brought Trump to power: not those who voted for such a complete shower, but the power brokers, regardless of political affiliation. Fair enough, Perloff does point out that Dorn would not have had much patience with the way the media, from bottom feeders like Murdoch to respectable news outlets, have dealt with Trump, profiting from him in direct proportion to their depiction of his incendiary rhetoric. And, importantly, she does citie Jeremy Prynne to the effect that  Dorn sought to keep "the language from falling into the hands of those who want to promote it as an oppressive instrument." Of course, Dorn, as Gunslinger aptly illustrates, always had form in this regard, relying on his own tangential approach to subject matter, linguistic turns and phenomenological asides, all to blow the lid off the intricacies of narrative poetry and the language of power. There are few before or after so wide-ranging and radical in their application and critique. Too bad  Perloff doesn't fully explore the contemporary implications of Gunslinger, but mostly settles for what she wrote all those years ago, which isn't enough when it  comes to imagining Dorn's possible critique of Trump.  Perhaps it's just that Gunslinger is a more radical poem and Dorn a more radical poet than she credits. Certainly, Gunslinger was never intended to be a "mock-reality show," as Perloff maintains, but an imagined journey into the heart of the American west. Too bad her forward only skims the surface, pointing towards the relationship between the poem, now fifty years old, and the present but without fully investigating what is really at stake.  


http://www.facebook.com/facebook-widgets/share.php

Saturday, September 29, 2018

On Dangerous Ground: Human Desire (1954), I Wake Up Screaming (1941)




















Human Desire (Fritz Lang, 1954)

Her legs crossed, propped-
up on dressing-table. Eye
moving from slip to slippers. 
Her right arm across stomach, 
left hand resting on left knee. 
Head tilted to the right. Not 
yet thirty: if vulnerable, then 
contemplative. Or vice versa
Perhaps a neon hotel, refuge 
from everything but the camera. 
Lit to highlight the shadows. 
Three profiles, two mirrors
In one an open door, a towel 
on a hook. Next to another door, 
room or hallway. How many 
doors to make room, or an 
exit? How many mirrors to 
reflect the worldHow many 
profiles to glimpse a likeness
And who would enter, if jealous 
husband, roustabout lover or 
predatory boss. She who might 
murder, the desire to be human, 
so human to desire. The tracks 
parallel, meeting, crossing, straight 
out of Europe, the entrance like 
the exit, through the hallway, 
door, shadows, reflection, desire.





















I Wake Up Screaming 
(H. Bruce Humberstone, 1941)

Walls, staircases, elevator shafts.
This must surely be why venetian 
blinds were invented. City angles 
dark rooms, claustrophobia, less 
angelic than threatening. Zanuck 
hated Tinseltown critiques, so took
it all to New York, with its nightlife, 
square jaws, hats, and cosmopolitan
homosexual innuendo. Then why
shouldn't a woman be attracted to 
the man who might have killed her 
sister; then that man waking up to 
find some inquisitive cop sitting 
next to his bed. droit de philosophe 
turning into templated shadows, severe 
lighting and a timely portentousness, 
like “What’s the good of living without 
hope?” Answer:  “It can be done.” Then
dogged by fog of intention: “What she 
meant we’ll never know. It’s what she 
said that counts.” Even if no one knows 
or cares what she or anyone says or 
means, be it melodrama or comedy. 
"Somewhere Over the Rainbow," 
reminder: this is a nearly recognizable 
nightmare of geometric wit and deceit.  


http://www.facebook.com/facebook-widgets/share.php

Wednesday, September 19, 2018

Four More: So Many Doors by Oakley Hall, November Road by Lou Berney, Unholy Land by Lavie Tidhar, This Is What Happened by Mick Herron


This Month's Favourite
                                 
Oakley Hall, So Many Doors (Hard Case Crime)
Praised  by Pynchon, Chabon, Richard Ford and Amy Tan, Oakley Hall has sometimes been referred to as a writer's writer. That could be the case, but it could also be something of a misnomer, since Hall was, if nothing else, a populist who had no qualms about pursuing a mass readership. After all, this is the person who wrote one of the great westerns, Warlock, that near-Marxist tale about an Arizona mining town. But Hall wrote  twenty-five other novels, most of them  historical in nature, invariably taking place in the west. His subjects included industrial disputes (Separations), the Mexican Revolution (Adelita) as well as Native Americans as well as the "taming of the west (Warlock, Bad Lands, Apache). He finished of a fifty-year career with the coming-of-age Love and War in California preceded by five novels featuring the infamous Bay Area journalist, wit, bon vivant, and disappearance artist, Ambrose Bierce. Published in 1950, and out of print ever since a 1959 edition, So Many Doors was Hall's second novel. It seems an unlikely choice for the Hard Case list of books. After all, one does not immediately think of Hall as that kind of pulp crime writer. But he did produce a handful of books that fit, easily or not, into that category, not only So Many Doors, but Murder City and Too Dead to Run. Set prior to, during and just after WW2,  the California-set So Many Doors moves  from Bakersfield  to San Diego, amidst graders, "cat skinners" and bulldoze drivers, their job being to flatten the land for future developers. But it's really a tale- like David Goodis's doomed lovers crossed with Jim Thompson's working-class malcontents- about the failure of men and women to understand one another, resulting in a kind of emotional sadism. All taking place in a world  in which everyone appears trapped, whether by class, job, or gender. That a murder has been committed seems as inevitable as the changing landscape and fortunes of the country itself.  (Published by Hard Case Crime in November)


Best of the Rest


Lou Berney, November Road (Morrow)
It's November, 1963, in New Orleans, just after JFK's assassination.  Frank Guidry,  a suave, middle ranking New Orleans crime boss finds himself peripherally connected to JFK's death. Realizing his life could be in danger, not so much from the authorities as from New Orleans crime boss  and assassination-fixer Carlos Marcello, he leaves the city and heads west, to Las Vegas where he hopes to seek sanctuary with a rival crime boss. Along the way he meets Charlotte,  travelling with her two kids and their dog.  She has recently ditched her hard-drinking but boring husband in Oklahoma and is also heading west. Though smart, she has no idea who she is dealing with. But, then, neither does Frank. One of those road novels that once you take the first bite, there is no way to resist the entire meal. 


Lavie Tidhar, Unholy Land (Tachyon). 
In Tidhar's latest, the Jewish homeland is in Palestina, East Africa ("It feels like a historical accident"), as proposed by some major Zionist figures in the early years of the 20th century. It's a world in which "there is still a Hitler, but it had escaped a Final Solution." Pulp detective writer Tirosh who lives in Berlin, returns to visit his homeland. He is meant to give a lecture, but wherever he goes mayhem follows him, and his original reason for being there gets lost in the mulch. All because he ends up searching for his niece who has gone missing. But this is not only an alternative world, one in which "you wonder what Jews are like when they are defined by the great Holocaust that shaped them, the survivors that formed of them creatures of power and guilt: more easy in their ways, more comfortable in their skin, or chaps just a nation as all other nations...," but an in-between world, where everything is breaking down and set to come apart at the seams. As usual, for a Tidhar novel, Unholy Land is prescient and nostalgic at the same time. If you know Tidhar's work- my favourite is still A Man Lies Dreaming, you won't want to miss this. If you've never read Tidhar, this is a good to start. You won't be sorry. (Published by Tachyon in November).

Mick Herron, This Is What Happened (John Murray)
Herron's This Is What Happened is a genuinely creepy tale, but one that, unlike his recent efforts,  does not center on, or have anything to do with, Slough House and that  group of marginal and much maligned British agents. And, I for one, was glad of it. No matter how much I enjoyed those novels, I was beginning to think Herron was stretching himself a bit too thin, and that he should set his sights on something different, if even for a book or two. The good news is that This Is What Happened  is every bit as good as the Slough House novels. This one takes place in London where a gullible, lonely woman, new to the capital, is kidnapped by a misogynistic, psychopath who, to keep her prisoner, feeds her a a false dystopic narrative.  It's both a novel, written in Herron's concise and spine-tingling prose, about misogyny, and a tale about how easily people can be manipulated on a steady diet of what can only be described as extremely fake news.  Though, after moaning that I was growing slightly tired of Jackson Lamb and his minions,  I found myself hoping they might pop up to save the day. Which I guess means I'm now ready for yet another Slough House episode from one of the finest writers around when it comes to espionage crime fiction.

http://www.facebook.com/facebook-widgets/share.php

Friday, August 31, 2018

On Dangerous Ground: Film Noir Poetry- Gun Crazy (1950), The Hitch-Hiker (1953).



“Ontology! I’m just
  telling you a story
  about this projector, that’s all.”


                     Edward Dorn, Gunslinger, Book II























Gun Crazy (Joseph Lewis, 1950)

Another case of Godard getting 
it right. Perhaps all you really do 
need is a girl and gun. Plus thirty 
days and a black-listed ghost, star-
crossed by mutual obsession. Soak 
and stir in delirious metaphor: trick-
shooter, gun stealer, carnival contest 
winner, to prove whose is bigger, if 
not best. Sleazily slipping on silk 
stockings, threatening to walk if her 
boyfriend isn't with the programme, 
ready to swim in her hapless pit of 
anxiety. Together seeking redemption 
in one-shot heist, from, not in, 
the back. Why show the teenage 
robbery- with ghost-laden precision- 
when you can depict trembling smirks, 
gazing into the past, while making 
plans to finagle the future. Adrenalin 
pumping gaggles of personas: tight 
sweater, cowboy gear, beret, like 
shapes of things to come, breathless, 
amidst soiled pruriencequote “Your 
cock has never been...female dog 
in heat." Perhaps that's just stating
an obvious ellipsis.  Better, if possible
to scam the studio, Das Capital in 
their pockets and Fuck you, League 
of Decency on their backs.  
















The Hitch-Hiker (Ida Lupino, 1953)

Fear of the other, past and
present. From picket-fence 
and fishing trips to inflagrante 
hitch-hikers with psychotic 
tendencies. Is that tough love, 
or, if pushed, simply physical 
deformity- the hitcher's drooping 
eye which, like Pinkerton's, 
never closes. Breaking in this 
new smog of paranoia, dragging 
those hostages all the way to 
Baja, tortured by a survival-of-
the-fittest spiel and the irksome 
inadequacies of everyday life. 
Like sharecropping desolation 
row. If you don't believe me, 
check the map: Lone Pine, not 
far from the source of L.A.'s 
water. Manzanar, where other
others were interned. Ida,
geographically sussed, riffing 
on the dangers of an outstretched
thumb and proverbial obsession:
a stranger asking for help could
be a killer, a commie, or, worse,
a commie killer. But when have
non-drivers not been suspect?
Like paying in cash, thumbing 
is a state of mind lacking in 
negotiable currency. And Ida, 
air-brushed, herself a hostage, 
stuck in another kind of desert, 
released for a price only after the 
world had all but passed her by.


http://www.facebook.com/facebook-widgets/share.php

Friday, August 03, 2018

On Dangerous Ground: Film Noir Poems- The Gangster (1947) and Gilda (1946)















The Gangster (Gordon Wiles, 1947)



Old-world scar maps a familiar but seldom 
visited country. Where arrogance and bravado 
morph into fear and cabbage. Where fatalism 
and tears flow like honey. So singer-obsessed 
he's lost interest in his empire, gaming tables 
located in the crevices of a diversified ice-cream 
parlour. What about an ad in the classifieds
corporation seeks new emperor of ice cream, 
greased by seam of sleazy modernity. Apply 
to melt this frozen empire. Total liquidation, 
everything slashed. Unreasonable love, hidden 
to heed the voices. Knowing power will soon 
be as negotiable as two-dollar bill. So stylised 
its scheming, one expects Gene Kelly to enter 
the frame, a leap of faith across a rain-ridden 
Coney Island boardwalk.“You know what my 
sins were?" asks Shubunka, yid too far for 
the studios.  "That wasn’t low and rotten and 
dirty enough.” With politicos still seeking less 
with more than ever, final grand gesture 
skinned of old world remnantsslight accent, 
cigarette smog, heart attack sandwiches and 
decayed lungs. Grist for melodrama that turns 
on an empty soap box, the politics of poetic 
realism searching the gutter to touch the stars. 



















Gilda (Charles Vidor, 1946)



A sluice of post-war Nazis sleazing it up 
down Argentina way. And that song, 
exotic turbulence churning routine, from 
self-preservation or convenience, the singer, 
displaying metaphorically-stained dress 
Bill might have denied denying, and her 
Nazi, tie the knot, unpredictably gordian, 
entangled by roving gambler with case 
of tango tumescence, rubbing his recent 
past against her precarious future.  But that 
fucking Nazi should have known hiring
a gambler to run a casino, tweaking his job
description to include spying on a libidinous
wife, was a hedge too far. A wall beyond
which to fixate on his sword-tipped cane 
affectionately called my little friendWhile 
an array of sycophants quack dubious dialectics, 
maracas shake, hearing hubby's plane bubbling 
under troubled waters. Disentangled to marry 
the lone stranger, who too will soon learn to 
grovel. As for the Nazi, they rarely die with 
such aplomb, floating shark-infested seas, 
treading wetness until the fish cry mercy, the
Argentine cows come home, and the blame 
is put on...a weapon of mass dysfunction, as 
euphemism for greater obscenity. “Men 
fall in love with Gilda," she said, "but they 
wake up with me.” No wonder out of all 
her filmsit was only musicals that Holly-
wood's closet chicana could bare to watch. 


http://www.facebook.com/facebook-widgets/share.php